Responding to the ‘crowd’ of voices and opinions in the paediatric … – Archives of Disease in Childhood

Ready access to the internet and online sources of information about child health and disease has allowed people more distant from a child, family and paediatric clinician to inform and influence clinical decisions. It has also allowed parents to share aspects of their childs health and illness to garner support or funding for treatment. As a consequence, paediatric clinicians must consider and incorporate the crowd of opinions and voices into their clinical and ethical reasoning.

We identify two key ethical principles and related ethics concepts foundational to this task. We then propose a series of exploratory ethics questions to assist paediatric clinicians to engage ethically with the multiple voices in the clinical encounter while keeping the childs needs as a central focus. Using two clinical hypothetical case examples, we illustrate how our proposed ethics questions can assist paediatric clinicians to navigate the crowd in the room and bring moral reasoning to bear.

We highlight a need for specific practical interactional skills training to assist clinicians to ethically respond to the crowd in the room, including to identify and weigh up the harms and benefits of endorsing or going against proposed treatments for a child, and how to discuss social media and online sources of information with parents.

Read the original:
Responding to the 'crowd' of voices and opinions in the paediatric ... - Archives of Disease in Childhood