When it comes to CRISPR, our society has some important decisions to make.
Just last week, scientists reported a new first in the journal Nature: They edited heritable cells in human embryos to treat an inherited form of heart disease. The day after the research was published, a group of genetics experts published a statement calling for further debate before applications of the technology are taken any further in humans.
According to a new survey of 1,600 adults published in the journal Science today, much of the American public shares this desire for engagement in decision-making. Led by Dietram Scheufele, a professor of science communication at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, the study found that while support for gene editing applications varies, a majority of respondents think the public should be consulted before genome editing is used in humans.
Gene editing presents the potential for remarkable benefits.
The potential to cure genetic disease and to ensure the safety of the world's food supply in the face of climate change are perhaps the most exciting opportunities, said Jennifer Doudna, a chemist at UC Berkeley who was an early pioneer of the powerful gene-editing technique CRISPR-Cas9 and was not involved in the new study.
But it also raises some serious ethical questions, especially when we turn our attention to tweaking the human genome, Scheufele said. Many people find some applications like disease treatment valuable, and others like making your children more intelligent morally shaky.
For example, scientists may eventually develop a cure for what some people dont consider an illness like a disability, Scheufele said. Would those who chose not to undergo genetic therapy or who couldnt afford it then be discriminated against even more as a result?
These and other ethical concerns go beyond the bounds of science, Scheufele says, and his poll results show that the public wants to be involved in the debate.
Oregon Health & Science University
Embryos develop into blastocysts after co-injection, which could someday be used in fertility clinics to help people trying to have children free of genetic disease.
Embryos develop into blastocysts after co-injection, which could someday be used in fertility clinics to help people trying to have children free of genetic disease. (Oregon Health & Science University)
Because of the fast-moving progress of gene editing research and the vast potential for both beneficial applications and negative consequences, many experts have called for public engagement on the issue including in a consensus report released this year by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).
The new study strove to answer some questions emerging from the National Academies report. First, how do people feel about different applications of gene editing? And secondly, do Americans agree that the public should be consulted on gene editing applications? Similar questions had been asked in previous polls, but the authors wanted to get some more specific data.
Human genome editing can be used for two broad purposes: therapy or enhancement. Therapeutic applications include the treatment of genetic disorders like muscular dystrophy or sickle cell disease, while enhancement might be used to change your daughters eye color or make her grow taller.
Each of these changes can be heritable or not, depending on which type of cell is tweaked. Somatic cells are nonreproductive, so any changes to these cells will not be passed on to future generations. Germline cells, on the other hand, are heritable therefore, any modifications will be inherited by the treated persons children and grandchildren.
Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017
A graphic from the paper showing the acceptance of gene editing by application.
A graphic from the paper showing the acceptance of gene editing by application. (Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017)
The new poll shows that two-thirds of Americans support therapeutic applications, whether to somatic (64% support) or germline (65% support) cells. When it comes to enhancement, however, there is much less approval. Only 39% of respondents find somatic enhancement acceptable, with 35% saying it is unacceptable. Levels of support dropped even lower for heritable germline enhancement, to 26% in acceptance and 51% in opposition.
When these results were broken down by how religious respondents were, some variation emerged. Religious people are less supportive of genome editing overall. Only half of them expressed some support of treatment applications, compared with 75% of nonreligious respondents. When it comes to enhancement, 28% of religious respondents and 45% of nonreligious people reported some level of support.
The authors also ranked respondents in terms of low, medium and high knowledge by their score on a nine-question factual quiz. Those in the high-knowledge category were far more supportive of treatment applications, with 76% in support compared with only 32% of low-knowledge respondents.
When asked about enhancement applications, the high-knowledge group was very polarized, with 41% in support and a nearly equal amount in opposition. In contrast, half of low-knowledge people reported that they neither support nor oppose gene editing.
Robert Blendon, who studies health policy at the Harvard School of Public Health, said that the polarization could be there for a reason. Those who know more about the technology have probably learned about it because they have a vested interest maybe a genetic disease runs in their family or they are concerned with ethical consequences.
Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017
A graphic from the paper showing the opinions of respondents based on religiosity and knowledge.
A graphic from the paper showing the opinions of respondents based on religiosity and knowledge. (Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017)
The more religious people were, the less likely they were to trust the scientific community to responsibly develop new technologies. This trend was opposite when it came to knowledge: The more knowledgeable people were about the technology, the more likely they were to trust the scientists.
While the two groups may have very different reasons, both highly religious and highly knowledgeable people agreed that the public should be involved in decision-making before gene editing is used in humans.
Blendon said that while its clear the public wants a say in how gene editing is used, its unclear exactly what public engagement looks like. The first way most people might think of being consulted is through their elected officials, but other surveys suggest that the public actually doesnt think the government should be making decisions about genome technology.
Scheufele said that there is currently no infrastructure in place for crucial two-way communication between scientists and the public on the genome editing issue but its important to develop it.
Diverse groups and perspectives have an important role to play in shaping the early stages of human genome editing research, Scheufele said. Scientists may not think to investigate all the questions that the public may deem vital.
If we ask the wrong questions, he said, then we may have perfect technical answers to all the wrong questions.
@mirakatherine
More here:
Americans want a say in human genome editing, survey shows - Los Angeles Times
- Muscular .Dystrophy -Successful-treatment by acupressure , Ayurveda, Yoga - May 10th, 2011 [May 10th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy Treatment - Todd Harrison Improving Balance - May 16th, 2011 [May 16th, 2011]
- Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy (OPMD): Exploring Causes and Treatment - May 20th, 2011 [May 20th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy Treatment - Todd Harrison holding body weight - May 21st, 2011 [May 21st, 2011]
- David G VECTTOR Muscular Dystrophy Treatment double arm strength month 6 - May 22nd, 2011 [May 22nd, 2011]
- David Gould Becker Muscular Dystrophy VECTTOR Treatment - June 2nd, 2011 [June 2nd, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy Halo - June 3rd, 2011 [June 3rd, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy VECTTOR Treatment Documentary - Todd's 6 Month Journey - June 7th, 2011 [June 7th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy Treatment Results - David Gould - New Footage - June 8th, 2011 [June 8th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy - Rewriting History with VECTTOR - June 10th, 2011 [June 10th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy - David Gould 5 month VECTTOR treatment for BMD - June 12th, 2011 [June 12th, 2011]
- Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy Stem Cell Treatment - Reelabs India - June 14th, 2011 [June 14th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy VECTTOR Treatment - Todd Harrison/Luau Presentation - June 16th, 2011 [June 16th, 2011]
- Dr. William Rader - Muscular Dystrophy Breakthrough - June 16th, 2011 [June 16th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy patient at Xcell-center - Nabeel Mohamed Abdulhusain, 46 years - June 17th, 2011 [June 17th, 2011]
- Charlie's Story: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Part 4 - July 18th, 2011 [July 18th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy VECTTOR Treatment - David Gould/Luau Presentation - July 19th, 2011 [July 19th, 2011]
- Testimonial 4 of Muscular Dystrophy after Stem Cell Therapy - August 5th, 2011 [August 5th, 2011]
- Drug Combo Dynamic in Muscular Dystrophy - August 9th, 2011 [August 9th, 2011]
- Testimonial for Fetal Stem Cell Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy - August 25th, 2011 [August 25th, 2011]
- Improvement seen in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy after Stem Cell Therapy - September 11th, 2011 [September 11th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy STS/VECTTOR treatment results - September 24th, 2011 [September 24th, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy VECTTOR Treatment Documentary - Todd's One Year Journey - October 2nd, 2011 [October 2nd, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy Treatment Day 18 - Todd Harrison's Improvement - October 2nd, 2011 [October 2nd, 2011]
- Wang Yisheng - Muscular Dystrophy Adult Stem Cell Patient - October 9th, 2011 [October 9th, 2011]
- Becker Muscular Dystrophy Miracle TREATMENT - October 11th, 2011 [October 11th, 2011]
- Muscular dystrophy patient_Kleber_Brazil.wmv - October 12th, 2011 [October 12th, 2011]
- Testimonial 1 of Muscular Dystrophy after Stem Cell Therapy - Video - October 18th, 2011 [October 18th, 2011]
- Becker Muscular Dystrophy STS Treatment - Video - October 18th, 2011 [October 18th, 2011]
- Potential Stem Cell treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy - Video - October 21st, 2011 [October 21st, 2011]
- Muscular Dystrophy treated by Dr Rajesh Shah at Life Force - Video - October 22nd, 2011 [October 22nd, 2011]
- Defying Muscular Dystrophy - I Made It - Video - October 23rd, 2011 [October 23rd, 2011]
- Becker Muscular Dystrophy AMAZING treatment results - Video - October 27th, 2011 [October 27th, 2011]
- First targeted treatment success for Duchenne muscular dystrophy - Video - November 6th, 2011 [November 6th, 2011]
- 125 Days of VECTTOR Treatment Progress - November 18th, 2011 [November 18th, 2011]
- Becker Muscular Dystrophy WALKING ABILITY IMPROVED - Video - November 25th, 2011 [November 25th, 2011]
- PT Muscular Dystrophy Treatment Results - Video - December 5th, 2011 [December 5th, 2011]
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Treated by Cellmedicine - Video - January 8th, 2012 [January 8th, 2012]
- muscular DYSTROPHY treatment IN HOMEOPATH.mp4 - Video - January 28th, 2012 [January 28th, 2012]
- Giulio's strategy is to cure dystrophy with stem cell treatment - Video - January 31st, 2012 [January 31st, 2012]
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy is a Featured Nonprofit Selected by Webkinz(TM) Foundation - February 1st, 2012 [February 1st, 2012]
- MDA Awards More Than $12 Million in Grants to Advance Neuromuscular Disease Research - February 1st, 2012 [February 1st, 2012]
- "For treatment we will have in the future" - Video - February 2nd, 2012 [February 2nd, 2012]
- Renowned Pediatric Cardiology Physician-Scientist Linda Cripe Joins Nationwide Children's Hospital - February 3rd, 2012 [February 3rd, 2012]
- JumpStart Invests $250,000 in Milo Biotechnology - February 14th, 2012 [February 14th, 2012]
- When nerve meets muscle, biglycan seals the deal - February 14th, 2012 [February 14th, 2012]
- Medical clinics offer help for Big Island children - February 16th, 2012 [February 16th, 2012]
- Dateline Long Beach: The Aquatic Center brings swim therapy to disabled - February 19th, 2012 [February 19th, 2012]
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy Awards $500,000 to Tivorsan Pharmaceuticals - February 21st, 2012 [February 21st, 2012]
- Cure Duchenne Announces Three New Funded Research Projects to Help Develop Treatments and Find a Cure for Duchenne ... - February 21st, 2012 [February 21st, 2012]
- Ligand Licenses DARA Program to Retrophin - February 21st, 2012 [February 21st, 2012]
- AVI BioPharma Regains NASDAQ Compliance - February 23rd, 2012 [February 23rd, 2012]
- Scientists create potent molecules aimed at treating muscular dystrophy - February 23rd, 2012 [February 23rd, 2012]
- AVI BioPharma Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2011 Financial Results and Corporate Update Conference Call - February 23rd, 2012 [February 23rd, 2012]
- Pembroke's Christine McSherry is an 'Inspirational Woman' - February 25th, 2012 [February 25th, 2012]
- The Rare Clinical Diseases Research Network - February 25th, 2012 [February 25th, 2012]
- A Solution for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy? - Research Summary - February 28th, 2012 [February 28th, 2012]
- A Solution for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy? -- In Depth Doctor's Interview - February 28th, 2012 [February 28th, 2012]
- Antisense oligonucleotides make sense in myotonic dystrophy - February 28th, 2012 [February 28th, 2012]
- A life of dependence - February 29th, 2012 [February 29th, 2012]
- Nationwide Children's Hospital neuromuscular disorder podcasts now available on iTunes - March 2nd, 2012 [March 2nd, 2012]
- Next-generation DNA sequencing to improve diagnosis for muscular dystrophy - March 6th, 2012 [March 6th, 2012]
- The Dire Limits of Health Care - March 7th, 2012 [March 7th, 2012]
- AVI BioPharma Announces Late-Breaker Oral Presentation of Phase IIb DMD Study at 2012 AAN Annual Meeting in April - March 12th, 2012 [March 12th, 2012]
- Cataracts affect millions of people around the globe, and for many of us they will be a normal part of our aging ... - March 14th, 2012 [March 14th, 2012]
- Your Health: Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy - March 16th, 2012 [March 16th, 2012]
- Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Shows Promise as an International Model - March 20th, 2012 [March 20th, 2012]
- Newborn screening for DMD shows promise as an international model - March 20th, 2012 [March 20th, 2012]
- Rhenovia launches drug discovery for Huntington's disease - March 20th, 2012 [March 20th, 2012]
- Halo Therapeutics Reports Favorable Independent Review of Lead Drug Candidate HT-100 - March 21st, 2012 [March 21st, 2012]
- Invasive treatment strategy may increase survival for patients with certain neuromuscular disorder - March 28th, 2012 [March 28th, 2012]
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy Endorses FAST Act Legislation to Expedite FDA Review of Life-Saving Therapies - March 29th, 2012 [March 29th, 2012]
- AVI BioPharma Announces Conference Call and Webcast on Monday, April 2, 2012, to Discuss Top-Line Data Results From ... - March 31st, 2012 [March 31st, 2012]
- Drug for rare disease may lift AVI BioPharma shares: Barron's - April 2nd, 2012 [April 2nd, 2012]
- AVI BioPharma Announces Eteplirsen Meets Primary Endpoint, Demonstrating a Significant Increase in Dystrophin at 24 ... - April 2nd, 2012 [April 2nd, 2012]
- U.S. Stock Futures Little Changed Before Factory Report - April 2nd, 2012 [April 2nd, 2012]
- Leading experts on congenital muscular dystrophy convene at University of Nevada, Reno - April 20th, 2012 [April 20th, 2012]
- Nature Publishes Work Utilizing N-Gene's Core Technology to Advance the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy - April 20th, 2012 [April 20th, 2012]
- Getting the boots filled - April 29th, 2012 [April 29th, 2012]
- Local business, civic leaders 'arrested' for MDA fundraiser - May 3rd, 2012 [May 3rd, 2012]