Fetal Brain Imaging Predicts Neurodevelopment of Babies With Congenital Heart Disease – Neuroscience News

Posted: Published on June 7th, 2022

This post was added by Alex Diaz-Granados

Summary: Smaller brain volume found in fetal MRI brain scans predicts the outcome of children with congenital heart disease across all domains of neurodevelopment.

Source: Boston Childrens Hospital

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) often have neurodevelopmental impairment. Until fairly recently, this was thought to stem from complications of cardiac surgery or reduced oxygen supply to the brain due to the heart defect.

Now we know that some babies with CHD have impairedbraindevelopment in utero because of lowoxygen supplyto thefetal brainor as part of the genetic disease process that caused CHD itself.

The ability to identify CHD before birth allowed a team at Boston Childrens Hospital to ask whether fetal brain imaging might predict childrens neurodevelopmental risk. If so, it would justify early interventions, perhaps even before babies are born.

A lot of brain development occurs during the fetal period that can influence a babys future trajectory, says study leader Caitlin Rollins, MD, in the Department of Neurology and Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Program at Boston Childrens.

Many babies with CHD receiveearly intervention, but the level of services can vary depending on local resources and level of concern. Prenatal MRI could help identify babies for whom we need to pull out all the stops.

MRI brain volumes and neurodevelopmental scores

Rollins and collaborators in Boston Childrens departments of Cardiology, Radiology, and Psychiatry began enrolling pregnant mothers in 2014.

Their first finding, reported last year in theAnnals of Neurology, was that fetuses with CHD, particularly those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) or transposition of the great arteries (TGA), have smaller brain volumes than those without CHD.

A newer study, published inCirculation, correlates these smaller brain volumes with neurodevelopmental outcomes. The team compared 56expectant motherswhose fetus had known severe CHD with 26 controls who had a family history of CHD but whose fetuses were healthy. Children with known genetic conditions or anomalies affecting organs other than the heart were excluded.

All the women had at least one interpretable fetal MRI brain scan. When their babies were 18 to 24 months old, the team carefully assessed their development and everyday functioning with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-3).

Smaller brain volumes on fetal MRI predicted the outcomes of babies with CHD, but not controls, across all domains of neurodevelopment. When the team looked at other variables, likebirth weight, caregiver education, complications such as seizure or stroke, and neonatal surgery, total fetal brain volume was the most consistent predictor of neurodevelopment. It was also the only variable that reliably predicted adaptive functioningskills necessary to navigate day-to-day challenges.

To the best of my knowledge, this is the first paper to associate fetal brain development with later neurodevelopmental outcome in patients with CHD, says coauthor Jane Newburger, MD, MPH, associate cardiologist-in-chief and founder of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Program.

It suggests that fetal brain size could be used as a trigger for early postnatal intervention and as an outcome measure for efficacy of fetal therapies.

Prenatal intervention?

Rollins stresses that while brain volumes were predictive of neurodevelopment at the group level, they may not be predictive for individual babies. Nevertheless, she says, the findings could help direct more intensive postnatal interventions, and possibly prenatal interventions, to the babies most in need.

For example, studies indicate that stress in expectant mothers can influence theirbabiesbrain development. The Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Program offers a Prenatal Stress Reduction Program, using mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral approaches, to all pregnant mothers whose fetuses have CHD. Rollins hopes to set up a clinical trial of this approach in the near future, using fetal brain imaging to help measure its effects.

Other potential neuroprotective approaches include maternal oxygen therapy and pharmacologic agents. These are still controversial, and we havent tried them yet, says Rollins. In the future, I expect we will embark on trials of different agents, especially in high-risk fetuses with HLHS or TGA, and use prenatal MRI to as a biomarker to help measure outcomes.

Future agenda

Rollins and her colleagues at Boston Childrens and across the country are now setting up an infrastructure to do multicenter studies.

We want to look the value of fetal brain MRI in different types of heart disease, which will require large samples, Rollins says.

In the meantime, the original cohort of children is now reaching school age (6 to 8 years). The Boston Childrens team is starting to evaluate them to see the long-term effects of small fetal brain volumes, if any. Adaptive functioning is of particular interest, since it can affect self-care, communication, and social skills later in life.

We want to see if theres a sustained effect, Rollins says. For many children with CHD, higher-order deficits in executive functioning, attention, and social cognition do not become apparent until school age.

Author: Nancy Fliesler Source: Boston Childrens Hospital Contact: Nancy Fliesler Boston Childrens Hospital Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Open access. Fetal Brain Volume Predicts Neurodevelopment in Congenital Heart Disease by Anjali Sadhwani et al. Circulation

Abstract

Fetal Brain Volume Predicts Neurodevelopment in Congenital Heart Disease

Neurodevelopmental impairment is common in children with congenital heart disease (CHD), but postnatal variables explain only 30% of the variance in outcomes. To explore whether the antecedents for neurodevelopmental disabilities might begin in utero, we analyzed whether fetal brain volume predicted subsequent neurodevelopmental outcome in children with CHD.

Fetuses with isolated CHD and sociodemographically comparable healthy control fetuses underwent fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging and 2-year neurodevelopmental evaluation with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III) and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Third Edition (ABAS-3). Hierarchical regression evaluated potential predictors of Bayley-III and ABAS-3 outcomes in the CHD group, including fetal total brain volume adjusted for gestational age and sex, sociodemographic characteristics, birth measures, and medical history.

The CHD group (n=52) had lower Bayley-III cognitive, language, and motor scores than the control group (n=26), but fetal brain volumes were similar. Within the CHD group, larger fetal total brain volume correlated with higher Bayley-III cognitive, language, and motor scores and ABAS-3 adaptive functioning scores (r=0.320.47; allP<0.05), but this was not noted in the control group. Fetal brain volume predicted 10% to 21% of the variance in neurodevelopmental outcome measures in univariate analyses. Multivariable models that also included social class and postnatal factors explained 18% to 45% of the variance in outcome, depending on developmental domain. Moreover, in final multivariable models, fetal brain volume was the most consistent predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome across domains.

Small fetal brain volume is a strong independent predictor of 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes and may be an important imaging biomarker of future neurodevelopmental risk in CHD. Future studies are needed to support this hypothesis. Our findings support inclusion of fetal brain volume in risk stratification models and as a possible outcome in fetal neuroprotective intervention studies.

Continue reading here:
Fetal Brain Imaging Predicts Neurodevelopment of Babies With Congenital Heart Disease - Neuroscience News

Related Posts
This entry was posted in Cardiac Surgery. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.