UK review finds skin-tone bias among pulse oximeters and AI datasets – Medical Device Network

Posted: Published on March 15th, 2024

This post was added by Dr Simmons

Some medical devices commonly used in the UKs National Health Service (NHS) are less effective on darker skin tones and feature bias towards white populations, according to an independent review by the governments Department for Health and Social Care.

The review was commissioned following NHS concerns throughout the Covid-19 pandemic that pulse oximeters may not be as accurate for patients with darker skin tones than for those with lighter skin.

Titled Equity in Medical Devices: Independent Review. the final report calls for regulators, developers, manufacturers, and healthcare professionals to take immediate action to ensure existing pulse oximeter devices in the NHS can be used safely and equitably for all patient groups across different skin tones.

At the same time, the report highlighted how the use of AI in healthcare is equally liable to show bias, often overcorrecting in the wrong direction such as the application of race correction factors based on erroneous assumptions of racial or ethnic differences or attempts to devise fairness metrics for AI devices that misrepresent patient populations.

In her foreword, lead author and chair in Public Health at the University of Liverpool, Margaret Whitehead detailed how the report is calling for the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MRHA) to draft guidance for patients and healthcare providers on how some pulse oximeters may not be appropriate for patients with certain skin tones.

It is also calling for a government-appointed task force on large language models (LLM) used by AI systems to assess the health equity impact of AI along with the proper resourcing to take on the problem.

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Your download email will arrive shortly

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

Country * UK USA Afghanistan land Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cte d"Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati North Korea South Korea Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Runion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates US Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam British Virgin Islands US Virgin Islands Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Kosovo

Industry * Academia & Education Aerospace, Defense & Security Agriculture Asset Management Automotive Banking & Payments Chemicals Construction Consumer Foodservice Government, trade bodies and NGOs Health & Fitness Hospitals & Healthcare HR, Staffing & Recruitment Insurance Investment Banking Legal Services Management Consulting Marketing & Advertising Media & Publishing Medical Devices Mining Oil & Gas Packaging Pharmaceuticals Power & Utilities Private Equity Real Estate Retail Sport Technology Telecom Transportation & Logistics Travel, Tourism & Hospitality Venture Capital

Tick here to opt out of curated industry news, reports, and event updates from Medical Device Network.

Submit and download

Whitehead said: Few outside the health system may appreciate the extent to which AI has become incorporated into every aspect of healthcare, from prevention and screening to diagnostics and clinical decision-making, such as when to increase the intensity of care. Our review reveals how existing biases and discrimination in society can unwittingly be incorporated at every stage of the lifecycle of the devices and then magnified in algorithm development and machine learning.

The evidence for adverse clinical impacts of these biases is currently patchy, though indicative. Seven of our recommendations are therefore focused on actions to enable the development of bias-free AI devices, with the voices of the public and patients incorporated throughout.

Among the recommendations aimed at tackling inaccuracy among pulse oximeters include health professionals advising patients who have been provided with a pulse oximeter for use at home to look at changes in readings rather than just a single reading, to identify when oxygen levels are going down and when they need to call for assistance.

It is also calling for clinical guideline developers and health technology assessment agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) to produce guidance on the use of pulse oximeters emphasising the variable nature of the devices regarding varying skin tones.

It is also calling for the MHRA and approved bodies for medical devices to strengthen the standards for approval of new pulse oximeter devices to include sufficient clinical data to demonstrate accuracy overall and in groups with darker skin tones.

In a bid to address concerns with AI, the company is also calling on the government to commission an online and offline academy to improve the understanding among all stakeholders of equity in AI-assisted medical devices. It also calls on researchers, developers and those deploying AI devices should ensure they are transparent about the diversity, completeness, and accuracy of data through all stages of research and development.

The report follows after a poll, conducted by medical diagnostic company Skin Analytics found that 84% of the British public was comfortable having their skin imaged by AI devices if it meant getting appointments more frequently. Previously in the US, another study by medical technology manufacturer Dermasensor demonstrated its skin cancer detection device can reliably detect cancers despite differences in melanin content and skin tone.

Give your business an edge with our leading industry insights.

Continued here:
UK review finds skin-tone bias among pulse oximeters and AI datasets - Medical Device Network

Related Posts
This entry was posted in Medical Technology. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.